Skip to main content

Incentives & Motivations At The Work Place

So I've been thinking, why do we work? I mean I understand the fact we get a salary and money is used to finance our daily lives but exactly why do we do the things we do at work? Is it really a simple matter of financial incentive that drives us?

The fact is, we don't always do the ideal thing we would want to do at work. Everyone ain't working their dream jobs so the motivations and incentives are different. Corporations had often used money and even punishment as a way of getting employees to produce results which I've always found to be rather... offputing. Why can't it be different? Why can't employer employee relationship be more reciprocal or rather about cooperation rather than fear of getting blamed for things?

This was something I looked into as I wrote a preliminary write up on Cooperation vs Competition in the free market as an alternative philosophy of business. Wouldn't the world be a better place if we cooperated with other, helping others to be better right from our work place. The positive factor would spill over to the rest of the world and the world would be a much better place for everyone. But instead of that, we have politicking, back stabbing, sabotage and generally negative behaviour to solidify the position of individuals at the expense of others.

I often found it rather hypocritical to expect government/world leaders to resolve differences and work together. Surely it would be a lot more effective if such shifts in the way we work started from the individual from a much smaller level and work its way up. The next time you see a colleague having a tough time, perhaps... just perhaps... its time for you to offer some comfort or help. Tell them they are doing a good job. A small nod such as that would go a long way to improve humanity as a whole. Think about it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Getting Into Writing Good Copies

I've been learning a little about the art of copywriting. The art of selling using written words. Interesting stuff but rather mysterious. It really does come down to the ad, the message the client wants to send out to the consumer, the theme, the things that the client would like to emphasize. I've found that writing a copy isn't like writing for a blog or a written piece of journalism of fiction or whatever your taste in writing may be.There are mainly three different areas of copy. The main headline, the sub headline and a more detailed excerpt or sales pitch(often written in a short paragraph). Often, it comes down to working closely together with the marketing team from the client and the creative director to ascertain the vision and messaging of an ad. The usual emphasis is on simple, easy to understand language. We are writing text for ads, not a novel. Messaging is kept simple so that consumers won't get confused by the message. But personally, I like to m

The Chua Soi Lek vs Lim Guan Eng Debate - The Dangers Of Partisan Politics

The debate that has been garnering quite a bit of anticipation over the weeks has finally happened. Lim Guan Eng from the DAP(current Chief Minister of Penang) took on MCA's President, Chua Soi Lek in a debate that was aired on Astro Awani earlier today. It was in Mandarin with translators translating the whole debate into Bahasa Malaysia(as best as they could). This is indeed a rather momentous occasion to have a political debate be aired on TV(granted it was Astro Awani, but it is still a significant moment nevertheless). Both of them agreed that they would like to see more of such debates happening. I would add that debates such as these expand the knowledge horizon of Malaysians and create awareness amongst the plebeians on the positions that our leaders take on key issues affecting the nation. It is rather unfortunate that I felt there was less of a focus on these key issues and a overblown insistence on putting the blame on the opposition(and by opposition I mean the other pa

Big Brother's Authoritative Streak - The Problem With Using Laws

The Nut Graph posted this little piece over here that is another indication of how the Malaysian government feels it needs to tell us, the honest people, how to live our lives. Just like the peaceful assembly act, just like the Universities and Colleges act, the Race Relations Act is yet another attempt of plugging in loopholes in our dysfunctional society. It's a stop gap measure that big brother uses all too often. Don't get me wrong, I find racism and discrimination of any sort repulsive. But the sheer audacity of the state to assume authority to control society is... quite contrary to the enlightenment, and egalitarian principles. It's sort of like repairing a damaged wooden village house. They take a plank and a hammer and hammer away to seal a gap, rather carelessly. Cracks and problems start to appear few years down the road as all manner of cretins manage to squeeze their way in through the impenetrable 'act'. The fact is, people will always find ways