Skip to main content

The 'Lah' Syndrome - Why lah? Please lah! Don't Lah!

"Why lah?" a friend inquired with complete terseness. The curt, simple and direct 'Why lah' cut like a knife and  denotes a measure of bewilderment in the tone of it. I suppose a simpler 'Why?' would have sufficed, but the 'lah' suffix adds more melodrama where there isn't any. Besides, the 'lah' has been a staple of Malaysian language inflection for aeons, it is as immovable as a traffic congestion on the Federal Highway. It's not just a Manglish(or an English language) thing too... "Kenapa lah?" shock, surprise, even a tinge of disappointment. The Malay language is not spared from the 'lah' contagion.

Often used as a suffix that accentuates the dramatic effect of a phrase, 'lah' could be used in multiple ways:

  • The classic 'Why lah?'
  • The added for conviction 'Come on lah!'
  • The added for surprise and shock 'WTF lah!'
  • For added appeal or even being indignant  'Please lah!'
  • The disillusioned 'I don't know lah!'
  • Last but not least, the hybrid Malay/Manglish usage of 'Ya lah' as a statement of agreement.
So much melodrama in Malaysian speech. I suppose it mirrors the tendency of Malaysians to over exaggerate just about anything. Favourite football club lost a match? What the hell lah! I'm not going to watch football ever again! Quaint. Why lah? The weather is so blardy hot!(in this case, the why is known. But the 'lah' is used just for the banality of it. An extra suffix sticking out like a vestigial limb).

Malaysians aren't the most wordy and eloquent(in speech) species on earth but we seem to have a love affair with peppering our sentences with nonsensical suffixes like the 'lah'. That's an extra word that can add maybe one or two seconds to a spoken sentence, I posit. What on the surface seemed like a terse sentence turns out upon further rumination to be added fluff.

While the the sentimental types of you out there may opine that the 'lah' is a measure of Malaysian culture. As iconic as our Nasi Lemaks, Roti Canais, Rojak, atrocious weather, or even broken Manglish(which is frankly, a double negative. Imagine that if you could... some Malaysians can't even speak 'proper' Manglish). I say that's a bloody shame. If the only way of adding weight to a sentence is to use fluff like 'lah', we are all the poorer for it(I mean in a non financial way of course). 

Instead of adding fluff, melodramatic and dead words like 'lah, we should be enriching our speech with a more diverse range of vocabulary. Perhaps we could say "Well smack my senses and call me the devil! but why?" or maybe "That is shocking and revolting if it be true!". Or... maybe not. But please, for the love of all things beautiful, think of your spoken words and elevate them past our melodramatic over exaggerations. I mean... Come on lah!           
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Getting Into Writing Good Copies

I've been learning a little about the art of copywriting. The art of selling using written words. Interesting stuff but rather mysterious. It really does come down to the ad, the message the client wants to send out to the consumer, the theme, the things that the client would like to emphasize. I've found that writing a copy isn't like writing for a blog or a written piece of journalism of fiction or whatever your taste in writing may be.There are mainly three different areas of copy. The main headline, the sub headline and a more detailed excerpt or sales pitch(often written in a short paragraph). Often, it comes down to working closely together with the marketing team from the client and the creative director to ascertain the vision and messaging of an ad. The usual emphasis is on simple, easy to understand language. We are writing text for ads, not a novel. Messaging is kept simple so that consumers won't get confused by the message. But personally, I like to m
Post a Comment
Read more

The Chua Soi Lek vs Lim Guan Eng Debate - The Dangers Of Partisan Politics

The debate that has been garnering quite a bit of anticipation over the weeks has finally happened. Lim Guan Eng from the DAP(current Chief Minister of Penang) took on MCA's President, Chua Soi Lek in a debate that was aired on Astro Awani earlier today. It was in Mandarin with translators translating the whole debate into Bahasa Malaysia(as best as they could). This is indeed a rather momentous occasion to have a political debate be aired on TV(granted it was Astro Awani, but it is still a significant moment nevertheless). Both of them agreed that they would like to see more of such debates happening. I would add that debates such as these expand the knowledge horizon of Malaysians and create awareness amongst the plebeians on the positions that our leaders take on key issues affecting the nation. It is rather unfortunate that I felt there was less of a focus on these key issues and a overblown insistence on putting the blame on the opposition(and by opposition I mean the other pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Big Brother's Authoritative Streak - The Problem With Using Laws

The Nut Graph posted this little piece over here that is another indication of how the Malaysian government feels it needs to tell us, the honest people, how to live our lives. Just like the peaceful assembly act, just like the Universities and Colleges act, the Race Relations Act is yet another attempt of plugging in loopholes in our dysfunctional society. It's a stop gap measure that big brother uses all too often. Don't get me wrong, I find racism and discrimination of any sort repulsive. But the sheer audacity of the state to assume authority to control society is... quite contrary to the enlightenment, and egalitarian principles. It's sort of like repairing a damaged wooden village house. They take a plank and a hammer and hammer away to seal a gap, rather carelessly. Cracks and problems start to appear few years down the road as all manner of cretins manage to squeeze their way in through the impenetrable 'act'. The fact is, people will always find ways
Post a Comment
Read more