Skip to main content

The Death Of Hitchens - Goodbye Dear Friend


If there ever was a person on this planet, that I would have loved to have met, it would have been Hitchens(Sagan was the other person). Having read his books, and watched his debates, I always felt like I had this unusual sense of camaraderie with the man(unusual since I have never actually seen him). He was like a friend that was always there to back you up. To remind you to keep your chin up and stand up for your bloody ideals... you sodding downer. He would say it a lot more eloquently though... unless he felt you really needed a 'jolt back into reality'.

It has taken me by surprise that his death would affect me this much... much more than actually reading his books(which always was able to make you realise how in depth Hitchens knowledge on any topic he dabbled in was). I feel like there is a sense of urgency, of having a responsibility, to at least... not let the Hitchens ideals down. To hold them up and be proud of them. Absolutely unapologetic, and to put arrogant, stupid, conniving bastards who are downright pernicious at their rightful place... as deceitful liars.

The world needs more honest people, and when capitalism and corporate bullshit punches you in the face and tell you that nice guys finish last. At least Hitchens was there to hitchslap you back to humanity, to remind you that as humans, we share a common solidarity for others. So don't be a bastard. Or I'll have to punch you with my verbal sucker punch.

His death is a cruel blow to all of us that has held rational thought as the basis of our existence. To the atheist, to the leftists, to all the honest people all over the world. It's the passing of one of the greatest literary and intellectual minds in these modern times. Just a week or so back, I commented at how coincidental it was that we both shared the same birthday. Now I shall always reminisce about Hitch during my own birthdays... What would he say when he was 63? 64? 65? When his daughters have grown up?

I've been on a bit of a tangential mind recently. Mostly due to some points that some anarchist philosopher/thinker has said that I don't quite agree with. Points that I find are in contrast with the idea of individualism. The right of the individual over the commune is a conflicting domain that needs some clarifying on my part. Anarchists that fall in the Anarchist Communism camp condemn the nihilist and individualist that they claim as being self centred.

I do not think individualists are self centred at all, in fact, it is a liberating philosophical idea that strengthens the community. That we have unique and different minds often compliments the commune from uniformity which is very... very ... bad. This is I'm pretty sure not what the Anarchists were at odds with but it is to an extent contrary to the idea of anarchism that the individual submit to the will of the commune(what makes that different to totalitarianism?). It makes it no different from a democracy where the minority is held hostage to the tyranny of the majority(which is also something that liberals claim is not what democracy is about).

Hitchens on the other hand was bloody clear about where he stood. He stood on his own against the scathing attacks of the reactionaries which he parries so effortlessly without a hitch... pun intended(he had friends of course, but could more than handle them himself). He admitted if he ever erred. But a man of unshakable principals. He attacked opponents and his enemies with an unflinching nerve that you almost feel sorry for the poor bugger to be called out by Christopher Hitchens. This is where I believe, I must grow myself into. I am not putting this down as destiny, as the very notion of destiny and fate runs contrary to the very idea of equality. People are who they choose to be, not born to be.

In the coming holidays, I'm going to be taking some time off from work to reflect on things. I'll be back much stronger and with more vigour than before(well... hopefully). The works of Nietzsche, Mill, Kant, Kropotkin, Smith and now Hitch will be my companion as I search for my centre. I am positive that I'm getting there. Hitch be my guide... well his writings at least(Hitch would never believe any sort of spirit or after live mumbo jumbo).

I've also got plans to start writing more political, social commentary style blog. Maybe I'll just use this blog to post more in depth and to peruse more serious topics such as that. I haven't figured that out yet. All thanks to Hitchens. I wouldn't dream of trying to live up to his incredibly high standards or writing, but I'll give it my best shot. Heck, I wouldn't exactly be lacking in topics to write considering the amount of piffle in the Malaysian political scene and society. Tarry no more, for time and tide waits for no man(or woman). Hitch, you've made a difference. And for that, I salute you. We'll miss you buddy.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The 'Lah' Syndrome - Why lah? Please lah! Don't Lah!

" Why lah ?" a friend inquired with complete terseness. The curt, simple and direct ' Why lah ' cut like a knife and  denotes a measure of bewilderment in the tone of it. I suppose a simpler 'Why?' would have sufficed, but the ' lah ' suffix adds more melodrama where there isn't any. Besides, the ' lah ' has been a staple of Malaysian language inflection for aeons, it is as immovable as a traffic congestion on the Federal Highway. It's not just a Manglish (or an English language) thing too... " Kenapa lah ?" shock, surprise, even a tinge of disappointment. The Malay language is not spared from the ' lah ' contagion. Often used as a suffix that accentuates the dramatic effect of a phrase, ' lah ' could be used in multiple ways: The classic ' Why lah ?' The added for conviction ' Come on lah !' The added for surprise and shock ' WTF lah! ' For added appeal or even being indignant  ...

P.G. Wodehouse Carry On Jeeves - I Say! What Ho!

I couldn't let off the chance of owning a P.G. Wodehouse book when I saw the book in a book store shelf. Yes... I'm quite the impulse purchaser of books. This is by no means a bad purchase though as the writing of PG Wodehouse came highly regarded among the English writing circle. I picked Carry on Jeeves... as the first Wodehouse books to own. Possibly his best known series. And by Jove is it a cracker! The Jeeves series follows the comedic exploit of one Bertie Wooster, a little lacking in the intellectual department and his valet(butler) Jeeves, making up for his master's lack of cranial matter. The book is a collection of Bertie and Jeeves stories, loosely connected with the each preceding one. It reads like a television comedy show, with each 'episode' relatively standalone in nature. There is no doubt that this series of books has had a huge influence on British comedy and comedy in general(we've had quite a few of comedy shows featuring a wise cracking ...

Homage To Catalonia - Someday I Shall Have Coffee at Huesca

Homage to Catalonia is one of the best(if not the best) wartime accounts from on the the best writer of our times. Serving with the leftist POUM militia(Partido Obrero de Unificación Marxista), Homage to Catalonia captures the optimism and idealism of revolutionary Spain. It then explores the mundaneness of trench warfare, which was more like non warfare. The treachery, living in fear of being outed, street fighting in Barcelona all vividly expressed. Even in the humdrum nature of it all, George Orwell writes a captivating account that manages to share with its readers the horrors and poor conditions of those in the front line and the political backstabbing from those that are far away from the actual fighting. A turbulent history of Spanish history with a huge variety of political entities fighting against fascism and against themselves. Homage to Catalonia ends with the hauntingly prescient paragraph in which Orwell expresses his disdain for his fellow En...