Skip to main content

The Death Of Hitchens - Goodbye Dear Friend


If there ever was a person on this planet, that I would have loved to have met, it would have been Hitchens(Sagan was the other person). Having read his books, and watched his debates, I always felt like I had this unusual sense of camaraderie with the man(unusual since I have never actually seen him). He was like a friend that was always there to back you up. To remind you to keep your chin up and stand up for your bloody ideals... you sodding downer. He would say it a lot more eloquently though... unless he felt you really needed a 'jolt back into reality'.

It has taken me by surprise that his death would affect me this much... much more than actually reading his books(which always was able to make you realise how in depth Hitchens knowledge on any topic he dabbled in was). I feel like there is a sense of urgency, of having a responsibility, to at least... not let the Hitchens ideals down. To hold them up and be proud of them. Absolutely unapologetic, and to put arrogant, stupid, conniving bastards who are downright pernicious at their rightful place... as deceitful liars.

The world needs more honest people, and when capitalism and corporate bullshit punches you in the face and tell you that nice guys finish last. At least Hitchens was there to hitchslap you back to humanity, to remind you that as humans, we share a common solidarity for others. So don't be a bastard. Or I'll have to punch you with my verbal sucker punch.

His death is a cruel blow to all of us that has held rational thought as the basis of our existence. To the atheist, to the leftists, to all the honest people all over the world. It's the passing of one of the greatest literary and intellectual minds in these modern times. Just a week or so back, I commented at how coincidental it was that we both shared the same birthday. Now I shall always reminisce about Hitch during my own birthdays... What would he say when he was 63? 64? 65? When his daughters have grown up?

I've been on a bit of a tangential mind recently. Mostly due to some points that some anarchist philosopher/thinker has said that I don't quite agree with. Points that I find are in contrast with the idea of individualism. The right of the individual over the commune is a conflicting domain that needs some clarifying on my part. Anarchists that fall in the Anarchist Communism camp condemn the nihilist and individualist that they claim as being self centred.

I do not think individualists are self centred at all, in fact, it is a liberating philosophical idea that strengthens the community. That we have unique and different minds often compliments the commune from uniformity which is very... very ... bad. This is I'm pretty sure not what the Anarchists were at odds with but it is to an extent contrary to the idea of anarchism that the individual submit to the will of the commune(what makes that different to totalitarianism?). It makes it no different from a democracy where the minority is held hostage to the tyranny of the majority(which is also something that liberals claim is not what democracy is about).

Hitchens on the other hand was bloody clear about where he stood. He stood on his own against the scathing attacks of the reactionaries which he parries so effortlessly without a hitch... pun intended(he had friends of course, but could more than handle them himself). He admitted if he ever erred. But a man of unshakable principals. He attacked opponents and his enemies with an unflinching nerve that you almost feel sorry for the poor bugger to be called out by Christopher Hitchens. This is where I believe, I must grow myself into. I am not putting this down as destiny, as the very notion of destiny and fate runs contrary to the very idea of equality. People are who they choose to be, not born to be.

In the coming holidays, I'm going to be taking some time off from work to reflect on things. I'll be back much stronger and with more vigour than before(well... hopefully). The works of Nietzsche, Mill, Kant, Kropotkin, Smith and now Hitch will be my companion as I search for my centre. I am positive that I'm getting there. Hitch be my guide... well his writings at least(Hitch would never believe any sort of spirit or after live mumbo jumbo).

I've also got plans to start writing more political, social commentary style blog. Maybe I'll just use this blog to post more in depth and to peruse more serious topics such as that. I haven't figured that out yet. All thanks to Hitchens. I wouldn't dream of trying to live up to his incredibly high standards or writing, but I'll give it my best shot. Heck, I wouldn't exactly be lacking in topics to write considering the amount of piffle in the Malaysian political scene and society. Tarry no more, for time and tide waits for no man(or woman). Hitch, you've made a difference. And for that, I salute you. We'll miss you buddy.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The 'Lah' Syndrome - Why lah? Please lah! Don't Lah!

" Why lah ?" a friend inquired with complete terseness. The curt, simple and direct ' Why lah ' cut like a knife and  denotes a measure of bewilderment in the tone of it. I suppose a simpler 'Why?' would have sufficed, but the ' lah ' suffix adds more melodrama where there isn't any. Besides, the ' lah ' has been a staple of Malaysian language inflection for aeons, it is as immovable as a traffic congestion on the Federal Highway. It's not just a Manglish (or an English language) thing too... " Kenapa lah ?" shock, surprise, even a tinge of disappointment. The Malay language is not spared from the ' lah ' contagion. Often used as a suffix that accentuates the dramatic effect of a phrase, ' lah ' could be used in multiple ways: The classic ' Why lah ?' The added for conviction ' Come on lah !' The added for surprise and shock ' WTF lah! ' For added appeal or even being indignant  ...

A Few Words About The Art Of Communicating

I've recently moved onto a new phase in life. Apart from being in a relationship that's given me so much joy, I've also been given the opportunity to be a copywriter at an ad agency. It's been quite an experience so far. Writing for ads is a lot different than regular writing. While the purpose of writing remains the same; an art of communication, the approach and thought process is a lot different. More thought and time is given to the psychological effect of headlines and copy. The key points to watch out for: 1) What will the reader think? 2) Does it attract the reader? 3) How will they look at an ad? Ads have to be eye catching either by brilliant copy or amazing visuals or both(both preferably). Copywriters have to understand what catches the attention of a reader. What demands attention. What stands out from the crowd of mediocre ads that spout the same message. To always try to present your message in a new and exciting manner. To sell the product in its ...

An Update On The Blog

Some big plans ahead for beginning new blogs. Which means this will remain as my personal blog. But what is going to happen is that write ups on books will go on a new book blog. There'll also be a blog on food stuff which is really interesting... I promise you, you have not read anything quite like it. Not your average food blog. The movie reviews will remain on my personal blog here. I don't have any intention to write about movies in detail just yet. What to expect from this blog? Just my personal rants, thoughts, emotional outbursts(okay maybe not this, I save it for others). Write ups on the state of politics, which I admit, haven't done much of lately. It's not in any real state that is worthy of a comment to be frank. Oh and write ups about things in life that annoy me... like my write up on marriage . Keep an eye out on my new blogs which I'll be creating soon. Until next time, don't let the lemurs fight.